Je bent niet aangemeld · aanmelden · registreer

Canadese populier 'AukŲnig' aan de Treppelweg zwischen Regelsbrunn und Haslau, Regelsbrunn, Oostenrijk


Afbeelding door MrGreen



Tim B, op 2012-11-12 11:08:43, zei:
Hi, Jeroen can also change the species of trees, so Jeroen, feel free to do so when there is consensus. I have now done it myself.

Kind regards,


Conifers, op 2012-11-11 21:27:26, zei:
Thanks! Yes, it has bark typical of true Populus nigra.
MrGreen, op 2012-11-11 20:04:07, zei:
Conifers, op 2012-11-11 19:27:54, zei:
Hi Mr Green - on a similar line, do you have a larger size original of this photo, please? It is probably correctly named, but I would like to see the bark pattern better to be sure. Thanks!
Conifers, op 2012-11-11 11:11:55, zei:
You're welcome!

Tim will change it when he checks the discussion next time he logs on.

Jeroen Philippona, op 2012-11-11 11:11:35, zei:
Hi Mr. Green,

Tim Bekaert, the webmaster, can change the species now the determination is sure according to the article. So you can ask him.

Jeroen Philippona

MrGreen, op 2012-11-11 10:50:07, zei:
Hey Conifers,

thank you very much for this helpful explanation, i will take care of the difference in the future.

I can't change the specified from P. nigra to P x canadensis. Is there anything I should do about it? Maby contact someone to change it?

Conifers, op 2012-11-11 10:16:37, zei:
Hi Mr. Green,


Of the identity, I only suspected it was P. ◊ canadensis before, I couldn't prove it. But the article says it has been proven now from genetic data. My evidence was the bark, which is deeply fissured with nearly parallel ridges (typical of P. ◊ canadensis, like "||||"); in pure P. nigra, the bark is less deeply fissured, and the fissures are crossing, less parallel (like "XXXX") - the difference is easily visible by comparing with your photo of this tree which is typical of true P. nigra.

MrGreen, op 2012-11-11 08:14:29, zei:
1. Yes that picture was taken after his death - I thougt I recorded that - sorry.

2. With all due respect - as far as I know, it is very hard to differentiate between the Hybrides and the genius in this case because it needs a biochemic-genetic proceed and consequently more than the knowlegde about the morphology. But I could be wrong, how did you determie that it is a Populus ◊ canadensis?

best regards,

Mr. Green

P.S. Excuse me for the bad Englisch.

Conifers, op 2012-11-10 22:43:34, zei:
Found this article:

Two points:

1. The tree is, sadly, dead.

2. It was (as I'd suspected from the bark in this photo) Populus ◊ canadensis, not Populus nigra.

Registreer of meld je aan om te reageren.
Commentaren (10)


Locatie: Treppelweg zwischen Regelsbrunn und Haslau, Bruck an der Leitha

Exemplaar: Canadese populier
(Populus ◊ canadensis) "6553"

Boomsoort: Canadese populier
(Populus ◊ canadensis)

48.12464, 16.748754
N48 7.4784 E16 44.92524
48į 7' 28.7" N, 16į 44' 55.5" E

Download GPX

Naam van de boom: AukŲnig

Fotograaf: MrGreen
Datum: 2012-02-08
Bestandsupload op 2012-02-08 17:34:32

382 keer bekeken gedurende laaste jaar



Aantal stemmen: 53
Gemiddelde rating: 4,49


Geen (alle rechten voorbehouden)

© · voorbehoud · ook beschikbaar in · Castellano · Deutsch · English · FranÁais · vertalen?