Vous n'êtes pas connecté · connexion · régistrer
Ajoutez nouveau sujet

Discussions récentes


Montrez seulement les discussions en français


TheTreeRegisterOwenJohnson, à 2014-09-29 20:13:23, a dit:
The Hirnant valley is actually just into Gwynnedd, with the watershed to the south-east forming the boundary with Powys. But I don't think there's an easy way to change the county.

Tim, à 2014-09-30 10:14:37, a dit:
This would work (for those having the rights to change a tree's location):

  • On the "Add tree" page, add a location in Gwynnedd

    This is filling up the page until you can select "Add new location" and click 'Save' there.

    Don't proceed as this would add a tree there, which you don't want to do.

    After this, you have an empty location in Gwynnedd

  • Go the page of tree on the old location and move it.

    This is: going to "edit data of tree" and selecting your freshly created empty location.

    It should appear in that list of choices.

Everything will be updated and the old location (now empty) will be removed from the lists.

Kind regards,


Visible pour tous · permalink · nl
Tim, à 2014-09-30 09:54:44, a dit:
Hi WaldFotograf,

you're adding very fine photographs of trees, which is great to see!

Welcome, and don't hesitate to ask if you have any questions.

Kind regards,


Jeroen Philippona, à 2014-09-29 22:13:05, édité à 2014-09-29 22:13:56, a dit:
The Giant Sequoia of Nymans looks like an easy victim for lightening as it towers far above the surrounding trees. To the left also some Sequoia sempervirens.

Jeroen Philippona, à 2014-09-29 21:45:08, a dit:
Hi Rob,

Would be nice if you also measured the CBH of such trees, as it gives an impression of the growth just like the heightmeasurement as well as of the total woodvolume.


TheTreeRegisterOwenJohnson, à 2014-09-29 19:46:59, a dit:
From their apparent youth, and location within a FC planted forest, I wonder if these are hybrids (Larix x marschlinsii), but I can't tell for certain from this photo. Larches are easily identified from the old cones which always lie underneath them - did you look?

WiPe, à 2014-09-26 19:54:41, édité à 2014-09-26 19:55:45, a dit:
Something we could never imagine has been written down in an article in the newspaper Ouest France of septembre 24thhttp://www.ouest-france.fr/lif-du-cimetiere-plus-que-millenaire-sera-abattu-2854054

A beautiful yewtree that is part of the remarkable repertoire of the Conseil General (C.A.U.E.), will disappear very soon. Before winter, from this yewtree, aged above a millennium, growing in the cemetery,there will nothing left but the memory and photos. The venerable tree has become dangerous.

A great disaster for the community. This yew, placed close to the tombstones, near to the church has seen many parishioners, year after year, strolling under its branches. What did happen to the tree? On august 19th, explains Pierre Pitrey, the mayor of Mongardon, a survey has been carried out by a company, specialized in arboriculture and city forestry. This yew tree shows very bad machanical defects on its stem and its rootcollar.

In simplified language: this yew tree is hollow and multiple cracks at and around the trunk threaten the direct environment of the tree. Verdict: He should be killed, for the security of people and property. The paperwork is being prepared for slaughter by professional pruners, as it will not be easy to cut this tree down. The veteran tree is located very close to the to the church and cemetery. This will be costly for the municipality, approximately € 3,500, between diagnosis and slaughter: and its beautiful foliage and trunk will end for disposal.

This is a tree with a circumference of more as 9 metres.

The yew , with and estimated age, between 1000 and 1200 he was honored in 2005 as a remarkable tree of Le Manche department, and listed as such by the C.A.U.E. Its circumference is 9 to 10 m, it has a height of 9 m and a crown of 11 m circumference. Its powerful trunk is leaning heavily, but seems stopped from falling by a tombstone, slipped under the bulge of the trunk, which seems to help keep the tree in balance.

The reaction of Les Tétars arboricols:http://lestetardsarboricoles.fr/wordpress/2014/09/26/lif-mongardon-en-sursis-manche/

This millenium old yew tree would become dangerous?! And the only solution would be to cut it down ?! I am totally appalled at how we condemn this ancestor which, I quote, " its beautiful foliage and trunk will end for disposal " ...

Call the city hall to try to influence this absurd and expeditious decision: 02 33 46 04 65

Tim, à 2014-09-27 17:22:19, a dit:
It is indeed sad that during the course of many centuries, only one action of single human is necessary to end a tree's life.
WiPe, à 2014-09-27 17:56:12, a dit:
we are really not that far yet. I have the idea that people in France are ready to fighth for this tree.
Wim Brinkerink, à 2014-09-27 18:28:31, a dit:
So I have made my statement on the site where French people can read it. I think that's more productive than ststing opinions among us..
TheTreeRegisterOwenJohnson, à 2014-09-29 19:11:00, a dit:
I shall forward this conversation to Tim Hills, who runs the website www.ancient-yew.org and who has years of experience in campaigning to protect ancient yews when they get condemned by ignorant consultants. He may want to offer his help to a campaign to save this tree, if he's not already aware of the threat to it.

Karlheinz, à 2014-09-29 14:43:03, a dit:
Die Art Carya illinoinensis wird falsch sein, ist es Carya cordiformis? Nüsse habe ich noch keine gefunden.

The species Carya illinoinensis will be wrong, it is Carya cordiformis? Nuts I have not found yet.



Conifers, à 2014-09-29 17:31:04, a dit:
Both the bark and the foliage are a good match for Carya cordiformis; compare e.g. here.
TheTreeRegisterOwenJohnson, à 2014-09-29 18:47:56, a dit:
I agree, Carya cordiformis.
Karlheinz, à 2014-09-29 18:57:16, a dit:
thanks, I have changed to cordiformis.

Wim Brinkerink, à 2014-09-29 15:48:19, a dit:
Very nice picture

Stephen Verge, à 2014-09-28 10:09:46, a dit:
Hello Rob

Off to Wales next week to see your trees near Waterloo Bridge plus some new ones. Will try to take a look at the Elan Valley Douglas on the way, where exactly are they?

Have you contacted the F.C. (now Natural Resources Wales) about these trees as I think they need a guarantee of protection. Especially it seems very likely they are the tallest Douglas Fir in the Northern Hemisphere outside the Pacific Coast of North America. I am sure they would be very interested. Although some ways better to keep the public quiet about them as having thousands of people trampling around them can be detrimental to their health due to root/ soil compaction, as the F.C often makes a trail to the trees. But letting the forest manager know is I think a good idea. What do you think?


Conifers, à 2014-09-18 16:28:55, a dit:
Chamaecyparis pisifera, recognisable by the cone shape and size, and shoot structure.
Martin Tijdgat, à 2014-09-20 07:14:00, a dit:

This is not Ch. lawsoniana. I think Conifers is spot on right with Ch. pisifera. A Lawson's cipres is not so open and transparent.

Greeting, Martin

Frank Gyssling, à 2014-09-28 09:40:18, a dit:
A dendrologist has again checked. You are right. There is obviously a pisifera a Chamaecyparis.

greeting frank

New functionality: cultivars/varieties/subspecies/...
Visible pour tous · permalink · nl
Tim, à 2014-09-26 16:23:44, a dit:

today I added new functionality:

  • on the "all species" page and on the page of each separate species (example) there used to be non-clickable lists of its cultivars, varieties, subspecies, ... Now these links are clickable and counts are shown.

  • added rudimentary variety pages on which you see some information (photos, ...)

    - changed the display of subspecies, varieties, forma, cultivars, and cultivar groups per Conifer's suggestion

    - allowed seeing cultivar/variety/... photo lists (e.g.photos of red beeches)

I hope this can already be helpful.

What still needs to be added:

  • adding the possibilty to filter down to cultivar/variety/... on the location lists and record pages

  • for some users: being able to edit the cultivar/variety/... information (e.g. change name, change type, remove, ...).

Kind regards,


Conifers, à 2014-09-26 20:27:54, a dit:
Excellent, thanks! I am starting on some nomenclatural tidying (e.g. Pinus nigra "var. austriaca" is an invalid synonym of Pinus nigra subsp. nigra).

Conifers, à 2014-09-26 20:33:04, a dit:
Addenum: the text on specimen pages still needs a bit of tidying, e.g. here it says "The tree is a specimen of the cultivar 'nigra'", whereas it should say "The tree is a specimen of the subspecies nigra".

Wim Brinkerink, à 2014-09-26 20:42:01, a dit:
Hi Tim,

Thanks a lot I'll explore it immediately. At first sight you made more possible than I could have hoped for. I even could select the Querus petrea mespilifolia. Great job. !


Tim, à 2014-09-27 17:19:39, a dit:

I will first add the possibility to rename the cultivars/..., change their type, and to delete them (it is already possible for a long time to create them, and to assign trees and reassign these trees).

Once the missing functionality is there, I will give the possibility to a restricted number of users to collaborate, agree on standards and to tidy up the cultivar list. I will post it here once the site's up to it.

Kind regards,


Overleg · Monumentale bomen
Visible pour tous · permalink · nl
Martin Tijdgat, à 2014-09-27 05:21:56, a dit:

Bedankt voor deze nieuwe verbeteringen. Zou graag werken aan wegpoetsen (tik)fouten in namen als je dat toestaat. Zie eerdere mail over fouten in naamgeving Ulmus.

Groet, Martin

Tim, à 2014-09-27 17:17:05, a dit:
Hallo Martin,

ik zal eerst zorgen dat het mogelijk is cultivars ed. te hernoemen, van type te wijzigen en te verwijderen.

Eens dat mogelijk is zal ik een beperkt aantal gebruikers rechten geven om deze functionaliteit te kunnen gebruiken en jij bent er één van gezien jouw Ulmusmail.

Ik laat iets weten wanneer ik zover ben.



Wim Brinkerink, à 2014-09-27 12:51:43, a dit:
Hi Leo,

Uit de veelheid van bomen heb ik er één gekozen om te meten. Op foto leek deze dezelfde als jij hebt opgemeten. Ik vond echter het verschil van 25 cm te veel en heb toen maar besloten een nieuwe op te voeren. Ik heb overigens de coördinaten aangepast. De strook bomen ligt ten noorden van de Ravensteinselaan en ze zijn op de kaart goed te onderscheiden omdat er twee paden doorheen lopen. Jij had ze ten zuiden van de Ravensteinselaan geplaatst.



RedRob, à 2014-09-24 16:59:11, a dit:
Doesn't look very healthy.

Conifers, à 2014-09-24 17:58:39, a dit:
If not already dead, it will be very soon. The pics on google earth (2011) show it as healthy just 3 years ago, so it is in very rapid decline.

RedRob, à 2014-09-26 17:20:39, a dit:
Agree Con, not long for this world.

RedRob, à 2014-09-26 17:19:37, a dit:
Tantalisingly close to 30 metres but closely consistant 29.6 metres, Britain and Ireland Champion. There must be a 30 metre Birch somewhere in the British Isles surely!? There must be taller Birch trees?

I have downloaded Mozilla Firefox and what a difference on this particular site, I can now get the map to zoom in, it doesn't freeze. Recently downloaded Internet Explorer 9 but had more trouble than ever with it since I last had it and un-installed it to go back to IE 8. Firefix definitely more compatible with this site.

kathryn, à 2014-09-24 19:15:27, a dit:
that is cool
luisindepels, à 2014-09-24 19:25:17, a dit:
its Eddy a friend....He did al the work...I put it here! it is him in the picture. I wasn't there!

kathryn, à 2014-09-24 19:16:14, a dit:
that is cool

RedRob, à 2014-09-24 16:56:44, a dit:
Very impressive Rainer, hate to ask but do you have a distance photo of the tree so we can appreciate it's size?

Rainer Lippert, à 2014-09-24 17:04:44, a dit:
Hallo RedRob,

leider habe ich kein Foto aus der Ferne. Der Baum steht mitten im Bestand, die Spitze ist nur schlecht einsehbar. Ich habe eine Position gefunden mit Sicht zur Spitze und zur Basis. Ich bin mir aber nicht sicher, ob es auch tatsächlich die höchste Spitze ist. Ich glaube nämlich, die Linde ist noch höher. In der Laubfreien Zeit möchte ich da nochmal hin, zwecks Messung.

Viele Grüße,


desainme, à 2014-05-10 16:45:40, a dit:
Autumn beech Hueston Woods between the perimeter road and the lake located between Brown Road and the docks.
Matt Markworth, à 2014-09-22 22:18:23, a dit:
Great photo. The American Beech and Tuliptrees are impressive at Hueston Woods. The topography doesn't lend itself to extremely tall trees, but this old growth forest is still magnificent.

TheTreeRegisterOwenJohnson, à 2014-09-22 17:18:13, a dit:
Congratulations on this one, Rob. As most of these firs are on a steep slope, would measuring to an 'average' height add much?

RedRob, à 2014-09-20 16:34:17, a dit:
Hello Rainer, great tree, do you have any longer distance photos that you could add? There is fore shortening in the photos that you have put on so the full height cannot be appreciated?

Rainer Lippert, à 2014-09-20 22:20:32, a dit:
Hallo RedRob,

nein, leider habe ich kein Foto von weiter weg. Man sieht diesen Baum auch nur recht schön von dieser Seite aus, von den anderen Seite her ist er von den Nachbarbäumen bedeckt.

Viele Grüße,


RedRob, à 2014-09-22 16:10:22, a dit:
Hello Rainer, know the problem, impressive tree and good find.

The 'Owen Johnson Tree'.
Visible pour tous · permalink · en
RedRob, à 2014-09-20 16:19:32, édité à 2014-09-20 17:38:45, a dit:
sapin de Douglas (Pseudotsuga menziesii) '19364'

I don't know what the convention and protocol is for naming trees but I think that this tree deserves more than being called '19364'. I also think that this is a superb stand of trees which were brought to light more fully and recorded with no fanfair in 2005. I think that credit is deserving and recognition. I don't know as said what the convention is, can the first person to measure a tree add a name, but I would like to give this tree a name and it will be the 'Owen Johnson Tree'.

Owen, if you are not happy with this just say but I think that you are very deserving of recognition.

Martin Tijdgat, à 2014-09-21 06:51:33, a dit:
Naming a splendit tree is in my opinion a good habbit. And why name tree only after kings or queens or to remember certain occasions? In Kortenhoef a Elm is called "Luijt Postma tree" after a retiring coworker of our office of public works. So please give this tree this name.

Martin Tijdgat, à 2014-09-21 06:51:55, a dit:
Naming a splendit tree is in my opinion a good habbit. And why name tree only after kings or queens or to remember certain occasions? In Kortenhoef a Elm is called "Luijt Postma tree" after a retiring coworker of our office of public works. So please give this tree this name.

RedRob, à 2014-09-22 16:08:50, a dit:
Agree Martin. Over here, a tree should have been named in honour of Alan Mitchell as he was such an early pioneer of tree measuring and finding trees. I wonder which tree would be appropriate for him, perhaps we could formally name one in his honour? I think this Douglas Fir is appropriate for Owen as I suspect that he may have some Welsh connections anyway given his name. Is this correct Owen?

RedRob, à 2014-09-22 16:02:44, a dit:
Another photo has been added here, what a spectacular little spot, reminiscent of Cragside House in Northumberland with the house just visible through the giant trees. I agree with Stephen on the other thread, watch the weather forecasts and you will see how High Pressure lingers over France (and Germany) with no isobars when we have tight isobars and gales here in the UK. I noticed it particularly last winter with all the storm systems passing over us and High Pressure just over the channel in France, over and over this pattern prevailed.

Stephen Verge, à 2014-09-16 07:26:04, a dit:
Hi Rob

Wow at least 6 trees over 60m! How long are the leaders of these trees Rob? Any noticeable wind damage from last winter?

I saw these trees in the dark with the car headlights and kick myself for running out of time to see them last year, will have to return soon. Looks like the weather will change next week so may hold off holiday there, until another anticyclone arrives to ensure good weather in Wales.

Will be at Europe's largest forestry show on Sat in the Midlands so may look at impulse lasers and the new model out and may or may not be tempted! Trouble is that would I have the time to use it? 10 years ago definitely would.


RedRob, à 2014-09-16 17:30:36, a dit:
Hello Stephen, just run out of time with fiddling with the maps.

Six trees of 60 metres, the lot I bet are 60 metres if you could find windows in to measure them, the whole stand of probably nearing a hundred trees.

RedRob, à 2014-09-17 17:00:58, édité à 2014-09-17 17:26:35, a dit:
Stephen, your visit on Saturday, I wouldn't be tempted would be my advice. Look, ascertain what you want but don't buy or else you will be robbed blind. Try sourcing the same instrument in Holland or the continent, you will get the same thing much cheaper, ridiculously cheaper. I got the Forestry Pro that I bought for half the price that they were being advertised over here. I couldn't have justified £500 odd quid for the laser but I am happy now with what I paid, I think that I have measured enough trees to justify it. Don't think that I could have ever have justified the price of one of the Impulse lasers, not for the number of trees that I have found and measured and am now likely to find in the future. I think you would have to be travelling the world measuring or a forestry professional or professional tree measurer to justify the Impulse. Judging by Karlheinz's and Kouta's recent measuring of the 59 metre Norway Spruce, the margin of error is not too bad for the Nikon Forestry Pro. We don't know if Kouta and Karlheinz chose precisely the same spot on the trunk to measure to so this is another error margin also Kouta may actually have had the correct spot and Karlheinz may have just been a tad high, we don't know but some of this probably accounts for the small difference.

Stephen Verge, à 2014-09-19 07:17:38, a dit:

Many thanks for your sensible advice. Just a query if you purchase something from abroad, UK dealers are often rather awkward when it comes to service and repair? What do you think?

Will look and not touch and find out prices, with me I can offset against tax which is helpful.

Perhaps now I can return to Scotland as it remains now in UK! To measure big conifers!



RedRob, à 2014-09-20 15:51:42, édité à 2014-09-20 15:52:27, a dit:
Hello Stephen, the Nikon Forestry Pro that I purchased has/had a 1 year manufacturers warranty which expired a year ago last July. A year on it is still going strong and hoping that it will not break. If it does at any point, it will probably cost nearly as much to repair as buying a new one so I wouldn't be getting it repaired and wouldn't be buying a new one. I think it comes down anyway to how you use the laser, I am ultra careful with mine, I don't let it dangle about from my neck letting it swing around as I am walking about, I hold it in my right hand horizontal and cushion it against jolts as I walk. As I have said umpteen times on here before, I roll my finger over the buttons at the top rather than pressing on them, I found early that this cuts down on agreat amount of laser movement at the time you press but it also cuts down on wear and tear on the buttons as well. I think with simple care and use, you can look after the laser and make it last. I always carefully clean the case and lens when I have finished with it before I put it away and so the laser still looks like new even though it is over 2 years old.

RedRob, à 2014-09-20 16:08:12, a dit:
Are there many more tall trees, 50/60 metre conifers to measure in these Isles? Chic Henderson is busy up in Scotland measuring and re-measuring trees at places all over Scotland where tall trees have been reported over the years. He has recently been at a place called Adverike (think that is correct spelling just offhand) on Loch Laggan where some tall trees were reported a few years but have not heard the results yet, even Owen hasn't? From the silence he cannot have measured a new tallest tree in Britain can we presume? An area that I would like to find some tall trees is mid Wales and South Wales, been scouring Street View and the forests of South Wales, going up and down the network of roads and there appears to be some tall looking conifers, Douglas Firs I think, just south east of theA465 at Cwmgwrach just south west of Glynneath. The tallest tree currently recorded is a 50 metre Grand Fir at the Cefn park near Cardiff which Owen found and recorded.

Stephen, do you live in Oxford or further north? If you decide to get a laser, would you be near enough Belvoir Castle for a visit? I had hoped to visit but will not be getting right down there, at least this year? A 42 metre Quercus Robur was reported there, a 29 metre Yew and 32 metre Prunus Avium, the first two are probably exaggerated possibly not the latter but it would be good to see them and confirm?

Jeroen Philippona, à 2014-09-21 12:17:32, a dit:
Hi Rob and Stephen,

My Nikon Forestry 550 is 5 years old now, very intensive used and not at all as careful handled by me, but still works fine. I have not heard from Kouta, Leo, Sisley, Nardo and many others that one of their Nikon laser instruments broke down till now. What I heard from long time users from the USA like Robert Leverett is also that their lasers work still after many years.


Stephen Verge, à 2014-09-22 10:18:38, a dit:
Hey thanks for all of the above helpful info

I was at the forestry show on Sat and tried out the Trupulse 200x. Impressed but very expensive £1700!!! Obviously Nikon far cheaper.

Rob I would say there are many places in the UK to find tall trees but mainly Scotland. Yes Ardverikie Estate in the Highlands has miles of tall trees big Noble/Grand Firs along Loch Laggan.

I think your 67m Douglas would be the tallest outside of its native range in the Northern Hemisphere at least, but there are taller trees in New Zealand apparently.

Wondered if it would be interesting in Monumental trees to rank which European Country has the greatest number of trees/species say over 60m? Presumably Scotland first, then Wales then Germany? There must be over a 100 trees at 60m in the UK by now.

I think Noble and White Fir Hemlock, Giant Sequoia will reach 60m in time.

I was looking at pictures of tall Douglas in Germany perhaps not as many as in Scotland and a climate not so good for growth, but what could be more important is average wind speed less which could mean trees there suffer from less damage from gales as the trees are not within the 'Atlantic Storm track.' Possibly grow taller?

Thinking about going to Wales this week, undecided!


Stephen Verge, à 2014-09-22 10:21:17, a dit:

Belvoir is about 200 miles away, bit too far. But I know a cherry in The Chilterns which could be a champ for height, possibly over 30m!


RedRob, à 2014-09-22 15:55:13, a dit:
Hello Stephen, where do you live? From what you have posted it seemed like the Oxford area but Oxford is 105.7 miles away from Belvoir so you must be alot further south if it is 200 miles? Do you live on the south coast?

Rayn, à 2014-09-20 19:49:46, a dit:
Is it known why it's called Schwedeneiche?
Rainer Lippert, à 2014-09-20 20:03:10, a dit:
Hallo Rayn,

im 30-jährigen Krieg, 1643, standen schwedische Truppen vor den Toren von Weida. Die Stadt wurde dann schließlich von den Schweden zurückerobert. Die Eiche wurde dann 1644 von der Bevölkerung aus Dankbarkeit zur Schwedeneiche erklärt. So die Erzählung.

Viele Grüße,


Rayn, à 2014-09-21 09:51:16, a dit:
Thank you. Magnificent trees get even more interesting with a history.
Martin Tijdgat, à 2014-09-21 11:54:08, a dit:

Can you place this information on the openingpage of this tree? I had the same question as Rayn did.

Greetings, Martin

Rainer Lippert, à 2014-09-21 17:49:18, a dit:
Hallo Martin,

ich habe es ergänzt. Ich hätte aber auch einfach auf meine Eichenseite verweisen können ;-)


Viele Grüße,


Martin Tijdgat, à 2014-09-18 01:27:40, a dit:

Welkom. Kan je de foto's rechtop zetten voor je ze upload?

Groet, Martin

Wouter, à 2014-09-18 07:28:00, a dit:
Bij mij staan de foto's rechtop voor de upload, ik weet niet wat er mis is gegaan.
Maarten Windemuller, à 2014-09-18 08:52:42, édité à 2014-09-18 08:53:39, a dit:
Heeft volgens mij te maken met de software en toestel (smartphone?) waarmee je de foto maakt en later bewerkt of rechtop zet.

Als je op de foto klikt en wacht op het +je (inzoomt) komt hij wel rechtop te staan.

Probeer de foto eens rechtop te zetten in Photoshop, Aperture of dergelijke en dan te uploaden.

Wouter, à 2014-09-21 15:52:35, a dit:
Ik heb het nogmaals geprobeerd, staat wederom niet recht. Echter als je op de afbeelding klikt dat krijg je hem in groot formaat en wel rechtop staand! Vreemd!
Martin Tijdgat, à 2014-09-21 16:09:31, a dit:

Vreemd dat dit zo loopt. Wellicht dat je Tim kunt vragen ze ook gelijk bij het openen rechtop te zetten. Heb je trouwens een detailfoto van bebladerde twijg. Het lijkt wel een zilverlinde, maar ik zie liever een detailfoto voor ik meer zeg.

Wouter, à 2014-09-21 16:23:56, a dit:
Nee, helaas niet we waren daar op vakantie, het kasteel en tuinen waren eigenlijk gesloten voor bezoekers. Gek genoeg ging onze wandelroute achterlangs en we konden gewoon door lopen. Heb gauw wat foto's gemaakt van het kasteel en de bomen die daar staan. Deze linde was behoorlijk groot en heb er ook wat foto's van genomen. Helaas zo gauw niet aan gedacht om meer gedetailleerde foto's te maken.
Martin Tijdgat, à 2014-09-21 16:57:20, a dit:

Je zegt linde, dan sluit ik me aan bij Maarten Windemuller en Conifers; dit is een zilverlinde, Tilia tomentosa. Pas je de naam aan, de boom is gedetermineerd.

Wim Brinkerink, à 2014-09-17 16:20:05, a dit:
Het is mij niet duidelijk wie aan de beschrijving een verhaal over meten op verschillende hoogtes heeft opgeschreven. Mijn ervaringen stroken daarmee. Ik heb nadrukkelijk het centrum van de boom opgezocht, maar daar alleen meten is hachelijk. Het is de kunst om het meetlint strak te houden en steeds te letten op 1.30 meter. Mijn eerste meting kwam uit op 6,57 meter en mijn tweede en derde op 6,56 en 6,49. Ik probeerde met alle macht het lint strak te trekken op de middenpositie. Uiteindelijk lukte me dat (denk ik) en ik kwam op 6,38 meter. Ik had van tevoren wel wat gegevens verzameld en in mijn gegevens stond een hoogte van 6,10 meter. Ik kan die hoogte absoluut niet aan mijn praktijkervaring koppelen.

Jeroen Philippona, à 2014-09-17 20:54:54, édité à 2014-09-17 20:55:47, a dit:
Hallo Wim,

Het stukje tekst over het meten is van mij. De laatste keer dat ik er aan het meten ben geweest was dit voorjaar samen met Corine van Dun, hoofdredacteur van Bomennieuws. Bomen op hellingen zijn lastig te meten, als je de methode hanteert van het centrum van de boom, waar de boom ooit ontkiemde of werd geplant, kom je bij heel dikke bomen op steile hellingen soms onder het hoogste punt rond de stam uit. Bij bomen op zo'n locatie is het aardig op verschillende hoogtes te meten. Wat je bedoelt met die hoogte van 6,10 m is me niet duidelijk.


Wim Brinkerink, à 2014-09-18 08:58:31, a dit:
Hallo Jeroen,

Lees voor 6,10 svp 6,18. 6,10 zat onterecht in mijn hoofd, dat moest 6,18 zijn. Ik had een overzichtje meegenomen met maten zoals ze op MT staan. Maar als ik jouw verhaal lees dan zou je toch een omtrek van 6,46 m moeten registreren? Of is de eerder door jou beschreven meetrichtlijn niet zo algemeen? Ik hou me er in ieder geval zo goed mogelijk aan, maar aarzel om 6,38 aan te geven. (wat volgens mij een juistere meting dan 6,18 zou zijn). (Overigens verklaart dat nog niet het verschil met jouw meting van 6,46 m.)


Jeroen Philippona, à 2014-09-21 12:21:50, a dit:
Het verschil tussen jouw en mijn meting bij de meting rond het middelpunt verbaast me niet: ik mat dit jaar ook een kleinere omtrek dan enkele jaren eerder, de gemiddelde hoogte is nu eenmaal moeilijk te bepalen. Dat was één van de redenen waarom men koos voor meten op 1,3 m boven het hoogste punt, dat is makkelijker te bepalen.

Het blijft een benadering, zeker bij bomen met een breed uitlopende voet, zoals veel Sequoiadendrons.

Groet, Jeroen

Rainer Lippert, à 2014-09-20 22:02:37, a dit:
Oh, 0,5 als Bewertung, doch so viel.

Viele Grüße,


Rayn, à 2014-09-21 09:49:48, a dit:
3.5 and counting...

Martin Tijdgat, à 2014-09-21 06:39:14, a dit:

Stephen Verge, à 2014-09-19 07:26:10, a dit:
Wow amazing!

Rob ever thought of purchasing one of those poles used in surveying so you can measure above the vegetation and add on accurately the remainder?


RedRob, à 2014-09-20 16:11:23, a dit:
Good idea Stephen, many more trees have clear views to the base but some like these don't so it would be useful.

Meant to add about this tree and it's measurement, bought a new twin pack Lithium CR2 pack for this visit but after the initial measurement, changed to the new/spare battery to double check the reading in case of any battery drain on the first battery that I used or any fault. Same readings.

RedRob, à 2014-09-20 16:27:37, a dit:
Also meant to say, this tree looked sparser then the neighbouring trees in front of it, it was a more open tree which can actually be appreciated in the photos. Hoping that it hasn't got the needle drop disease or small signs of it? Maybe it is just a more open crowned speciman that the two denser, lusher specimans next to it.

Martin Tijdgat, à 2014-09-20 07:22:26, a dit:
Lovely, the nearby waterflow in this picture. Thanks for that, martin

Stephen Verge, à 2014-09-17 07:04:18, a dit:
Hello Owen

A very impressive stand of trees for that part of the country! It may be that the North Sea moderates the climate somewhat here? Although to a lesser degree than say the New Forest on the channel coast? Any Sitka there?

There is a Douglas just north of Henley, Oxon (close to me) which is almost as tall planted 1917 and still growing (on chalk!) Possibly tallest tree in Oxon if not Bucks and Berks.


RedRob, à 2014-09-17 16:48:31, a dit:
I agree with Stephen, abit of a surprise but an impressive one. The Grand Fir is very impressive. I do abit of plane spotting and have been to RAF Lakenheath several times and the soil there is like dust-sandy,dry. As said to someone, amazing that the conifers in Thetford Forest can survive in the soil. I imagine it will be very dry at the moment as it has been very dry in Eastern England for the last few weeks.

TheTreeRegisterOwenJohnson, à 2014-09-18 17:53:23, a dit:
Yes, I think the North Sea does help conifer growth in Norfolk - the most stressful conditions are often when there's a dry hot easterly wind and this will be cooler (and moister) when blowing off the North Sea.

There aren't any Sitkas at Weasenham Woods but at another of the Coke family's 19th century experiments in continuous-cover forestry, Fulmodeston Severals, there is a (youngish) plantation with trees to 37m. Again rather remarkable, as this tree really doesn't like it hot and dry.

TheTreeRegisterOwenJohnson, à 2014-09-18 17:55:04, a dit:

I remember you mentioning the Douglas Fir near Henley before. I think there are a few of your records that have not yet found their way onto the Tree Register, for one reason or the other - this is one. It certainly sounds like the tallest tree in the Home Counties area - perhaps you would be able to add it to this site?


Stephen Verge, à 2014-09-19 07:11:48, a dit:
Thanks Owen and Rob

Of interest to tree growth and climate from the Met Office averages 1981-2010, (On climate section on Met Office site can't post hyper link here) shows average rainfall of 700-800mm for North Norfolk, slightly less than The Chilterns where I am, 800-1000mm over higher parts, hence growth of conifers is slightly better than other Home County areas. Also shows why conifer growth/productivity is some of the best in the cool temperate world in Wales and the North West UK.

Owen I am reluctant to submit tangent measurements due to their possible inaccuracies, which may or may not be correct, but would be I hope within + or - 2m. Until I get a laser?


Do you know the giant Sessile Oak near the Mezel Depot in Windsor Great Park next to the park junction? Mentioned in Alans book as 125ft x 20ft (magnificent as any) Probably the oldest oak I have encountered, because adjacent Sessile about 390-400 years based on a solid ring count! Will do report on this for monumental trees soon. It says avenue was planted in 1751!



RedRob, à 2014-09-16 17:20:26, édité à 2014-09-16 17:27:49, a dit:
When I press on 'Show on Map' the Google Map is close with individual trees visible. Press to change the location the map has panned out and I cannot get it to zoom in, I have to just stick a red bubble. Conifers, would you be able to put this directly in front of the 65 metre tree.

RedRob, à 2014-09-16 17:28:15, a dit:
Zooming in now, intermittant problem.

Conifers, à 2014-09-16 20:40:38, a dit:

RedRob, à 2014-09-18 16:39:27, a dit:
Thank you Conifers, able to move them to the exact spot once you have stuck them near.

Martin Tijdgat, à 2014-09-18 13:55:35, a dit:

Vraag het Tim deze fraaie Zilverlinde rechtop te zetten. Verander je zelf de status van nog niet gedetermineerde boom naar Tilia tomentosa?

derWaldfotograf, à 2014-09-18 13:31:37, a dit:
Stamm der Sommerlinde (Kirche im Hintergrund)

derWaldfotograf, à 2014-09-18 13:29:33, a dit:
Smmerlinde (von der Kirche)

Conifers, à 2014-09-16 16:44:11, a dit:
Tilia tomentosa
Wouter, à 2014-09-16 16:59:57, a dit:
Yeah that's what I thought, did not know sure for 100%
Maarten Windemuller, à 2014-09-18 08:56:45, a dit:
Let op de "zilveren" onderkant van de bladeren onder in de kroon.

European beech at Trollskog in Torna Hällestad, Dalby, Sweden
Visible pour tous · permalink · en
Conifers, à 2014-07-23 20:21:37, a dit:
A technical point: as these trees are seed-grown (self-sown), they are Fagus sylvatica f. tortuosa, and not the cultivar 'Suenteliensis', which to be true to name can only be propagated clonally by grafting.

Martin Tijdgat, à 2014-07-23 22:03:10, édité à 2014-07-23 22:04:25, a dit:

Thanks for this. You are absolutely right; this is the naturaly occuring forma tortuosa. I had the same type of discussion with Fagus sylvatica 'Asplenifolia'.or 'Laciniata'. This leafform also occurs naturaly and has been grafted under a few different names.

Maarten Windemuller, à 2014-07-23 22:17:54, édité à 2014-07-24 08:50:18, a dit:
Thanks, that's true, it's not a clone. I changed name. New problem: I cannot get a small "f" before tortuosa. The system automatically generates a capital F. Will ask Tim to change it. But what must we think about the oak, MT nr. 18706? :)

Tim, à 2014-09-17 19:58:00, a dit:

I changed the cultivar 'Tortuosa' in subsp. tortuosa, and registered this tree as such.

I also made it so that cultivars/varieties always get a capital letter (as was the case), but subspecies don't.

Kind regards,


Maarten Windemuller, à 2014-09-17 20:24:09, a dit:
Thanks Tim,


Conifers, à 2014-09-17 21:25:57, édité à 2014-09-17 21:26:23, a dit:
Hi Tim,

Thanks! A bit of clarification though, re "I also made it so that cultivars/varieties always get a capital letter (as was the case), but subspecies don't".

The ranks of subspecies, variety and forma are botanical, and governed by the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature; they are always in italics and begin with a lower case letter, and must always show an indication of which rank is being used (the rank NOT in italics!):

Pinus nigra subsp. salzmannii

Pinus sylvestris var. hamata

Fagus sylvatica f. tortuosa

Cultivars, and cultivar groups, are governed by the International Code for Nomenclature of Cultivated Plants; they are not in italics, and begin with a capital; individual cultivars are in single quotes, groups of similar cultivars not in quotes:

Acer platanoides 'Crimson King'

Acer palmatum Dissectum Group

Hope this helps!

Rayn, à 2014-09-17 17:39:28, a dit:
Magnificent composition!
Wouter, à 2014-09-17 21:07:13, a dit:

Jeroen Philippona, à 2014-09-17 20:36:42, a dit:
Hoi Wim,

De Villa dateert uit 1742, maar hoe weet je dat de lindes ook uit 1742 dateren? Zijn het heel zekere winterlindes, ik zag ze tot nu toe aan voor Hollandse lindes maar heb er niet heel goed op gelet. Leo, Maarten en Simen Brunia waren tijdens de Donateursdag van de Bomenstichting vorige week ook present bij deze bomen, misschien hebben zij er ook op gelet.

Groeten, Jeroen

Rayn, à 2014-09-17 17:44:57, a dit:
Definitely no beauty, but still a fascinating tree!

RedRob, à 2014-09-17 17:23:17, a dit:
Apologies, the measurement should be 20 August 2013, forgot to change from 2014.

Ernie certainly loved these trees so much that he was buried amongst them with his dogs but these have been the single most disappointing trees that I have ever measured. Planted in 1860 and 37 metres in 1957 I was hoping that the measurement was abit out and that they had spurted in growth and there would be 60 metre trees in Yorkshire. Even with the growth rate of 37 metres in 1957 they could have been 56/57 metres. What a disappointment when I got there and measured with the laser.

RedRob, à 2014-09-15 17:23:12, a dit:
Hello Owen, this is/was the tree at the top of the stand where the path turns to the left, straight in front of you with Ivy on the trunk. I could only get 52 metres for this tree but I couldn't see the top at any point with a view of the base. Assessing from further down where I managed to see the tip, I think I will have missed about twenty feet off, every tree that I have measured in this stand is/was 60 metres so I will assign 60 metres for this one. It certainly was not 14 0r 15 metres taller then 52 metres.

TheTreeRegisterOwenJohnson, à 2014-09-16 19:35:10, a dit:
I think the tree in the lower photograph is one I got 60m for - on the left of the footpath after you've gone round the bend and continued climbing. The one I made 61m was about 50m below this, a few metres away from the bend in the path (o the SW side) and with a lot of ivy. Maybe it has been removed since.

RedRob, à 2014-09-17 16:49:41, a dit:
Hello Owen, both photographs are the same tree, I couldn't get it in one photograph so took two photos like this.

Wim Brinkerink, à 2014-09-17 16:12:35, a dit:
Ik heb de betreffende boom gemeten op 16-9-2014. Wat mij betreft is meten op 1.30 niet reëel of mogelijk. Op circa 1.10 meter loopt een tak uit, waardoor je volgens mij op 1.10 meter moet blijven. Ik heb op die plek 5,27 meter gemeten. Ik vind de sprong naar mijn voorgangers erg groot(die nb op 130 cm hebben gemeten!), maar...ik kan niet anders dan dit maar opvoeren.

Wim Brinkerink

RedRob, à 2014-09-16 17:21:24, édité à 2014-09-16 17:22:25, a dit:
Conifers, this is just at the other side of the road further to the left than I put it, tree nearest road. Thanks.

Conifers, à 2014-09-16 20:43:40, a dit:
Done, can you check I've got it right, please!

Monumentale bomen in Duitsland
Visible pour tous · permalink · nl
Wouter, à 2014-09-16 15:23:55, édité à 2014-09-21 16:17:51, a dit:
Weet iemand hoe oud de linde op het hof van Slot Hämelschenburg is ?? Is een flinke boom.

Groeten Wouter


RedRob, à 2014-09-15 17:05:44, a dit:
Difficult measuring conditions on the slope in the upper part of the Waterloo Grove, difficult on many or most of the trees to see base and apex tip together. I did manage to measure three trees cleanly through gaps and this was the tallest. The others were also 60 metres. I didn't explore enough further up last year on my visit and thought that there may be a taller tree in the higher part of the stand but I think they will be all around this height in the higher and slightly more exposed part of the stand. The tree looks like just a trunk but the sun was shafting through the trees and I was photographing towards it.

RedRob, à 2014-09-04 16:23:53, a dit:
Need abit of help with this one, more photos available if required. The trunk pattern didn't seem smooth enough for Abies Grandis, the foliage not flat enough and the shape not quite right for conventional Grandis that I have seen? What is this tree?

Conifers, à 2014-09-04 16:49:00, a dit:
The bark looks OK to me for Abies grandis, it gets like this on mature trees. What foliage was it you looked at, if it was windblown upper crown foliage, then that's normal for the needles to be more assurgent.

RedRob, à 2014-09-04 17:14:59, a dit:
Hello Conifers, the tree had lower branches sweeping down and I photographed the foliage close up which I have posted if you look at all the photos. Not seen any really big, old Grand Firs as close up as this so not seen the ribbed bark like this before. The terminal foliage on the shoot ends around the buds also seemed abit more rounded than other Grand Firs that I have seen but maybe this is with age as well, I suppose it is what you have seen yourself which you compare to.

Conifers, à 2014-09-04 18:27:52, a dit:
Hi Rob,

Thanks! What the foliage does fit in that case is the interior subspecies Abies grandis subsp. idahoensis (from east of the Cascades crest); this has somewhat assurgent foliage throughout the crown, not just at the top of the tree. The only problem with this is that it is a smaller, slower-growing tree than coastal subsp. grandis, a 50 metre specimen would have to be ancient.

Abies grandis subsp. idahoensis grades into Abies concolor in the south of its area, including (in the southwest of its area) into Abies concolor subsp. lowiana, which is also a large, fairly vigorous tree (though not as vigorous as subsp. grandis). But it does perhaps offer a potential source location in the southern Cascades in Oregon.

It might be worth contacting the FC to see if they have planting records for the plot. A lot of the older plantings of Abies grandis in Britain are of the interior subspecies (being smaller, it was much cheaper to collect the seed!), before foresters discovered how much slower and poorer its growth was compared to coastal origins.

RedRob, à 2014-09-05 16:19:48, a dit:
Hello Conifers, I had never heard of Idahoensis, learn something new every day. From reading the description it does describe these trees, the foliage just didn't seem flat enough for conventional Grand Fir (quote 'stongly flattened' from one site) and it seemed to taper around the buds and recurve more than the usual Grandis (you can see it in the photos) which I have seen myself albeit I won't have seen as many examples as people like Kouta, yourself, Owen etc. Any comments from anyone else, Owen, Kouta, Jeroen, Karlheinz?

RedRob, à 2014-09-05 16:48:19, a dit:
Just uploaded a further foliage photo of this tree taken up tree. As said, still might be wrongs but it just didn't look fully right for Abies Grandis, the rounded tapering recurving needles around the terminal buds.

Stephen Verge, à 2014-09-06 07:48:01, a dit:
Hi Red Rob and Conifers and all

I'm back after my busy summer!

Foliage is typical for Grand Fir east of the Cascades. Most seed imports into this country up to the 1960's were of this interior form. I remember seeing this tree last Sept, so 52m, yet another!!

RedRob, à 2014-09-08 16:09:29, a dit:
Hello Stephen, welcome back, missed reading your posts. This does look like Idahoensis, this one wasn't even the tallest, that was 53 metres for the other one that I put on here the other day. Vyrnwy, cloud and mist was hanging over the lake and it may be fairly mild comparative here, would this mean that Idahoensis would possibly have more potential for growth here than east of the Cascades which I imagine is certainly colder in winter and drier?

Stephen Verge, à 2014-09-10 07:53:32, a dit:

Most of Grand Fir in the UK before the 1960's came from just east of the crest of the Cascades, little came from the actual Pacific Coast so most of the oldest and tallest are probably of inferior growth rate, but likely to grow faster in UK. I was not aware this has been regarded a sub species, is this recent?

I may go on holiday later this month to find some more giants, have you been on holiday there too?


RedRob, à 2014-09-10 16:05:18, a dit:
Hello Stephen, are you going on holiday to the Pacific Northwest or to look for trees in this country? I was in North Wales and Powys last week but there are areas in central Wales that could have some tall trees if you want some ideas? The Elan Valley area, Alan Mitchell recorded 50 metre Douglas Firs there way back in 1979 I think it was. I have located some myself which I had hoped to visit but never made it down as far.

Stephen Verge, à 2014-09-10 20:38:46, a dit:

Hope to go back to North Wales if the weather holds out later this month. Find some big trees and maybe pan for some gold if there is time!

Perhaps try to look at the Elan Valley on the way but its quite far from North Wales.

How is the tall Douglas in the Conwy Valley doing? I left too late one evening and only saw them in darkness with the headlights on!



RedRob, à 2014-09-11 16:30:25, édité à 2014-09-11 16:31:54, a dit:
Hello Stephen, will be reporting on the Betws trees from this year's visit when I get around to it over the next few days.

Before I visited North Wales this year I spent a considerable time scouring the valleys of North Wales on Google Maps looking for dark shadows and long shadows from the satellite and then looking on Street View. Really don't think that there are any more really tall stands in the Snowdonia area, Coed Y Brenin, Conwy Valley, Vyrnwy, Aber Hirnant seem to be the places. I drove all over last week scanning various valleys in the Berwyns and up around Betws and didn't come across anything taller or anywhere near. I have been to the forests around Corris on a previous visit and the trees there are not exceptional. An area where there could be tall and unknown trees is central Wales, Elan Valley and further down, Twyi Forest and the forests near Llandridod Wells. Owen sent me the records but I cannot find them in my emails so I have just asked him again, Alan Mitchell recorded big Douglas Firs back in 1979 and if they have kept growing at a reasonable rate they could be pretty big now.

RedRob, à 2014-09-12 16:48:28, a dit:
The estate at Llanwrthwl was called Glanrhos SN973641 Owen has informed me again.

https://maps.google.co.uk/ put Glanrhos estate into search. I have been up and down the lane and there is a group of tall conifers which look like Douglas Firs but they don't look super tall and are in an open, exposed position. Not sure if these will be the trees which Alan Mitchell recorded or not?

http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/2526900 This group in the Elan Valley is a group that I came across whilst searching, on Google Maps they do look pretty tall but there looks to be abit of distortion in the camera which may be fore-shortening them in height when viewed from the bridge. They are in the bottom of the valley so should be pretty sheltered. Stephen, if you do make it anywhere down this way in passing this group would be worth stopping at. I haver just been riding up and down roads in Tywi Forest and the A44 between Llanwrtyd and Abergwesyn and over towards Aberystwyth and had longer range views and the conifers look ordinary.

Stephen Verge, à 2014-09-13 09:24:31, a dit:
Hi Rob

Elan valley looks interesting, it may be a bit far out to travel to North Wales, but I could do a detour.

Dyfi valley was an interesting place for big plantation grown conifers. Sadly as usual The FC felled the best stand of Hemlock about 10 years ago. With good soils and shelter the forest is very productive here.

It will be interesting to see how Dothistroma needle blight is progressing there in North Wales it was partly defoliating conifers and causing them to lose vigour.

Hope to make it back there if the weather remains good.


RedRob, à 2014-09-13 16:49:48, a dit:
Hello Stephen, I really don't like to hear the talk about needle drop, especially connected with some more trees that I have yet to post on.

I have been up the Dyfi Valley on Google Maps and there is large scale felling viewable. If you put 'Pantperthog' into Google Maps and travel about a quarter of a mile north on the A487, there is a line of tall trees that I think may be Douglas Fir. Look big but not massive but abit hard to truly judge on Google Maps as I have seen distortion on some views. These are the tallest that I can find in this area, beautiful countryside though, wonderful smooth roads (as they all appear to be down there compared to the potholed lot we have up in Yorkshire) sweeping through deep, wooded valleys. Visited King Arthur's labyrinth at Corris in 2006 and it was great countryside.

If you want a nice little B&B Stephen, I can recommend one near the north end of Lake Bala, a little gem with great food and incredibly reasonable. It provided a great, central base for my visit.

Stephen Verge, à 2014-09-14 10:44:59, a dit:
Thanks Rob

Look forward to more posts on Welsh trees.


Conifers, à 2014-09-14 22:38:42, a dit:
Remember to change the species to Abies grandis ;-)

RedRob, à 2014-09-14 16:51:09, a dit:
In a spot of bovver and need abit of help. Whilst looking up at the 60 metre Douglas Fir at Vyrnwy (next to ex 64 metre champ) I fired the laser off across the ravine to the group od spruces on the other side and this was the tallest. Came to a decision but just want to double check? Can it be identified from the blowing the photo up to see foliage and bark pattern?

Conifers, à 2014-09-14 22:38:00, a dit:
Picea sitchensis

Han van Meegeren, à 2014-09-14 21:08:37, a dit:

RedRob, à 2014-09-14 16:58:21, a dit:
I know that I have asked before but any chance of some photos being added to these records? There are some impressive trees listed here, I and I suspect others would love to see them?

RedRob, à 2014-09-14 16:24:07, a dit:
Hello Stephen, the Welsh weather changed in a very short time and it was tippling down by the time that I took this photo but I think the Douglas Firs that you were referring to have been caught in this photo in the background. I stood up the hill on the road and looked back over to assess and the trees down near the road definitely physically looked the tallest when viewed from the horizontal up the road. The land rises up the valley and the trees near the road looked level with the higher trees, I suspect that they will be 51/52 metres, the tallest tree that I measured on the road definitely the tallest of it's line, dfinitely 54 metres but could be 55 metres.

RedRob, à 2014-09-14 16:54:43, a dit:
Sorry Stephen, just re-read your post and it was you further up the hill and not the trees. You must have been in the same spot as I was if you were on the road.

Conifers, à 2014-09-14 16:13:43, a dit:
Not Ulmus glabra - leaves too small and glossy; looks more like U. minor or perhaps U. × hollandica.
Rainer Lippert, à 2014-09-14 16:17:01, a dit:
Hallo Conifers,

also mal wieder ein falsches Schild am Stamm. Hatten wir ja schon des öfteren. Ich ändere es mal in U. minor ab.

Danke und viele Grüße,


RedRob, à 2014-09-13 16:55:19, a dit:
Beautiful tree, how come some of the Norways remain narrow in shape and clothed with branches way down and yet others are very open and lose their lower branches? There are both types up in Yorkshire, they look quite different at times? Do they vary according to what area they originated from?

KoutaR, à 2014-09-13 18:33:32, a dit:
I believe that the main reason, why this tree has foliage almost along the whole lenght, is that its one side gets plenty of light (the tree is standing at a creek). But branching patterns of Norway spruce also vary genetically, also within a single stand.

Stephen Verge, à 2014-09-14 10:43:15, a dit:
Yes nice tree

Just wondering how the age was calculated. Norway spruces are lucky to live 200 years in U.K.. It may be that fungal pathogens may be less aggressive in continental climates with colder winters?


KoutaR, à 2014-09-14 11:24:35, a dit:
The www-site of the park says "Ihr Alter schätzt man auf etwa 380 Jahre" = "Its age is estimated as ca. 380 years". http://www.nationalpark-saechsische-schweiz.de/der-nationalpark/naturraum/naturwald/die-fichte-picea-abies/

I am not sure but I think I saw boring traces in the trunk. It is definitely much older than 200 y. Spruce cannot attain almost 5 m girth in 200 years in Germany. The UK's climate is apparently not the best for Norways spruce. Possibly too ocean. Fungal pathogens may be one factor, indeed. "Conifers" knows more about this, I once has a short e-mail discussion with him.


RedRob, à 2014-09-11 17:07:05, a dit:
Hello Stephen, the tallest tree that I found in Aber Hirnant is the one on the left in the distant photo, 54.2 metres although the base was difficult to see and I had to estimate the location so it could be near 55 metres. Is this the tree that you found, near the group of houses with the Sequoiadendron in the garden?

Stephen Verge, à 2014-09-14 10:51:41, a dit:

Glad you found them. Could be my tree but was further up the hill when I recorded 55m. Probably some of the oldest Douglas in Wales, some close to 1.8m in diameter. I reckon planting was around 1860-1870? tried to count the whorls but too difficult. Some of these trees could have in excess of 40m3 each!


What is your favorite tree
Visible pour tous · permalink · en
kathryn, à 2014-09-12 23:14:25, a dit:
i like weeping willows

RedRob, à 2014-09-13 16:43:01, a dit:
Hello Kathryn, generally Coast Redwoods are my favourite tree, love their size, majesty and indeterminable will to live when damaged or felled, branches becoming new trunks if one falls and is laid on it's side. Individually, my favourite tree on this site is this one épinette de Sitka (Picea sitchensis) '9351'

such a maligned tree but what a magnificent speciman and what magnificent trees Sitkas can make.

kathryn, à 2014-09-12 21:06:07, a dit:
that is cool

americano1951, à 2014-09-12 19:53:11, a dit:
Cuando voy a Aranjuez visito este árbol y otros mucho que hay en Aranjuez, son muchos muy grandes.

JesusGiraldo, à 2014-09-12 19:42:47, a dit:
Pino Pazo do Cabido

RedRob, à 2014-09-12 17:03:56, a dit:
Jeroen said that this Larch was just up form the path (is that correct Jeroen, did I remember correctly) I think likely that this is the same tree, measured 43.6 metres but to a point on the trunk above the Bracken, estimate about 0.5 of a metre to the point, this tree is 44 metres or just a fraction over. Didn't look incredibly healthy, quite sparse.

RedRob, à 2014-09-12 16:55:21, a dit:
45.8 metres was the reading that I got for this tree from close to the position in the photo and further around to the left from the road. Vegetation around the base so aimed just abit up from it but this tree has not put much growth on since 2010.

RedRob, à 2014-09-12 16:25:57, a dit:
Great to see the Redwoods in Big Basin and Henry Cowell being featured, a great many photos exist for the trees in Humboldt and the north (MD Vaden's site) but few for down here. It would be interesting to see some Redwoods from the southern most groves in Big Sur, what is the tallest recorded down there?

RedRob, à 2014-09-12 16:51:01, a dit:

These are the tallest Redwoods recorded in Big Basin.

RedRob, à 2014-09-10 17:06:17, a dit:
Owen, if you are anywhere about, (a plaque near this tree says it is 39 metres and the tallest in Britain) I moved across the shoots at the top and the highest reading that I could get was 37.6 metres for this one with this laser.

TheTreeRegisterOwenJohnson, à 2014-09-11 17:50:26, a dit:
Thanks. I'll update the record.

RedRob, à 2014-09-12 16:27:32, a dit:
Very close Owen to your measurement although must not have grown in 10 years. Couldn't get a reading higher than this from several angles.

bodyman777, à 2014-09-12 01:48:42, a dit:

bodyman777, à 2014-09-12 01:17:29, a dit:

bodyman777, à 2014-09-12 01:09:30, a dit:
come share your tree pics at https://www.facebook.com/groups/MonarchTreesoftheDelawareValley/

bodyman777, à 2014-09-12 01:08:36, a dit:
come share your tree pics at https://www.facebook.com/groups/MonarchTreesoftheDelawareValley/

TheTreeRegisterOwenJohnson, à 2014-09-10 17:26:55, a dit:
Probably P. balsamifera or one of its 20th century forestry hybrids. Possibly 'TT37'?
RedRob, à 2014-09-11 16:21:50, a dit:
Hello Owen, didn't strike me as any form of Canadensis and have seen quite a few types now, leaves really prematurely browning and trunk not fissured but seemed smoother with brown patches on it.
TheTreeRegisterOwenJohnson, à 2014-09-11 17:52:48, a dit:
The smooth bark is right for some balsamifera clones ('TT32' is very smooth but has a different habit, I think 'TT37' is similar in bark). The premature autumn colour is due to a fungal infection which the balsam poplars and the wild Black Poplar get, but not the Black Poplar's common hybrids.

monumentalinsc, à 2014-09-11 17:28:07, a dit:
2nd tree in the property

Site problem. Site problem.
Visible pour tous · permalink · en
RedRob, à 2014-09-11 17:02:15, a dit:
Hello Tim, I am having consistant problems on the site registering trees and moving about in general, the following message keeps coming up at the bottom of the page:

Monumentaltrees.com is not responding Recover Webpage

Is this problem at your end or mine? I downloaded Windows Internet Explorer 9 a couple of weeks ago after unistalling it a year or so ago and going back to IE 8 after having locking problems which I never experienced on IE 8. Is the problem above likely to be mine with IE 9 or with the site?

RedRob, à 2014-09-11 17:04:49, a dit:
Sorry, not making a point but had abit of trouble with the posting, Site Problem disappeared in the box and I typed it again and then it has somehow appeared twice.

desainme, à 2014-09-11 04:08:28, a dit:
This was right side up
Frank Gyssling, à 2014-09-11 12:24:43, a dit:
you can rotate the photos also correctly


desainme, à 2014-09-11 04:37:16, a dit:
Stout English oak

Rainer Lippert, à 2014-09-10 18:06:35, a dit:

in der Literatur wird diese Eiche als "Bouquet-Eiche" bezeichnet. Dies begründet sich durch das Bouquetförmige abgehen der unteren Äste.

Viele Grüße,


Rainer Lippert, à 2014-09-10 18:05:30, a dit:

in der Literatur wird diese Eiche als "Dicke Eiche" bezeichnet. Die "Bouquet-Eiche" wird dort die zweitdickste, mit knapp 9 m Umfang angeben. Bei der zweitstärksten Eiche gehen zudem die Äste Bouquetförmig ab.

Viele Grüße,


RedRob, à 2014-09-10 16:31:56, a dit:
Abit more help needed with an ident? Couldn't get any closer than this but clearly a Poplar but leaves turning very early? The bark pattern is visible if you zoom in? Thought that they may be Aspen but not seen enough Aspen to be positive?

Conifers, à 2014-09-10 16:58:27, a dit:
Not Aspen. Probably Populus × canadensis or one of the hybrids of this with Populus trichocarpa.

RedRob, à 2014-09-10 15:54:06, a dit:
Are these likely to be Abies Grandis Idahoensis? There are some more ten didn't quite look right for 'normal' Grandis, the crowns more rounded and lumpy, more similar in fact to the Vyrnwy trees.

Conifers, à 2014-09-10 16:56:48, édité à 2014-09-10 18:16:36, a dit:
Quite likely, yes.

Oh, and PS - where 'should' it be? The map does not show it anywhere near the B5105!

RedRob, à 2014-09-10 16:01:11, a dit:
Hello Kouta, thank you for the short article, very interesting. A graceful tree in shape, this one with branches down to near the ground. Surprising that the Cragside Nordmann is nearly as tall, 49 metres. Perhaps eventually some specimans in Wales or Western Scotland could be the tallest, there was a 2005 42 metre speciman at Bodnant Gardens where I was last week but I wasn't able to measure as the area had been fenced off with no publice permitted. We need some tree measurers from the Caucasus area on here to find trees to measure.

KoutaR, à 2014-09-10 16:09:58, a dit:
Hello Rob,

I think the UK has at least greater potential for tall Nordmann firs than the Borjomi Reserve, because of milder and moister climate. The westernmost part of the Georgian Greater Caucasus may have taller trees than the Borjomi Reserve, but the real giants are likely still further west, in Abkhasia and the Russian part.

I agree that it would be the best to get information from local forest researchers. I tried to contact one but did not get answer (not surprising).

Nordmann fir in Georgia
Visible pour tous · permalink · en
KoutaR, à 2014-09-10 15:52:21, édité à 2014-09-10 15:54:41, a dit:
As most members likely know, great heights up to 85 m have been claimed for Nordmann fir (Abies nordmanniana). These super-tall firs have been reported mostly from the Russian western Caucasus and Abkhazia. I discussed Nordmann fir heights with Prof. Peter A. Schmidt, a renowned Caucasus expert. He said giant firs can be found in the western Greater Caucasus, particularly in the Russian part and in Abkhazia and he has not seen any giants in Georgia (excluding Abkhazia, which is not in Georgian control anymore). According to him, the Georgian floras and other sources give the max. height of the species as 50 m. Thus, I did not expect to find any super-tall trees in Borjomi Reserve, and the fact that the tallest tree I found was only 50.2 m http://www.monumentaltrees.com/en/geo/samtskhe-javakheti/borjomi/9778_borjomistrictnaturereserve/) is no argument against the possibility that the claimed super-tall trees exist.

While in the park, it became clear to me why there are no super-tall firs: the vegetation clearly shows that the climate is way too continental and dry for optimal tree growth. The southern slopes are covered with low forests of such drought-resistant taxa as Quercus petraea ssp. iberica, oriental hornbeam (Carpinus orientalis) and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris). The northern slopes are moister but Scots pine is still very common, along with Caucasian spruce (Picea orientalis) and common hornbeam (Carpinus betulus); the forest floor is fairly open. Along the Georgian Black Sea coast there is a mild and moist “rainforest” strip but the fir does not grow there. As a conclusion, it remains a mystery whether Nordmann fir can really reach 70 or even over 80 m.

Sisley, à 2011-11-13 11:33:18, a dit:
Tank you for this very amazing tree !!

I have never think that a white poplar can be a so big tree....

Piotr Gach, à 2011-11-13 11:39:54, a dit:
You're welcome :). I have always admired trees of this species. Thank you very much for this opinion.


Andrew Weber, à 2014-09-01 23:57:42, a dit:
Really great tree, even in prof. Seneta's book it is.. poplars can be very monumental

Polecam w łódzkim regionie tę topolę białą: peuplier blanc (Populus alba) '18923'

Może wytrzyma jeszcze ze 100 lat i będzie tak sławna jak lesznowska koleżanka.. :)

Piotr Gach, à 2014-09-02 03:46:42, a dit:
I hope so, because the white poplar 18923 is also a very great tree! But there are some other candidates with similar (even greather) size in Poland, so we will have interesting competition in future :).

[Ja też mam taką nadzieję, bo kandydatka na następczynię rzeczywiście niczego sobie! Ale podobnych kondydatek jest więcej, więc zapowiada się ciekawa rywalizacja :).]

Andrew Weber, à 2014-09-03 22:45:35, a dit:
Looking through your site [rpdp] I discovered interesting thing that 'my' poplar which I desribed in previous post, from Zalesie, may be the largest with crown that grows very highly - more than 10metres, maybe even 15, depending upon estimations.

That is why it should be found in new album of famous Krzysztof Borkowski's book, hopefully He will know about this great tree.. And I really recommend you to visit this place (obviously in future, maybe for a few years) because probably it is worth visiting. And I could feel like an adventurer discovering this poplar, but it is very important to desribe this tree as a natural monument, I will strive for this. Best regards and thanks for your work for dendrology! :)

Przeglądając ogromne topole białe na stroniehttp://www.rpdp.hostingasp.pl/Trees/UI/TreesList.aspx?mode=G&load=1&startFrom=101&uAcronym=&cf=&MY=1&OTH=1&NMC=&ATC=&ALV=1&NALV=1&INEU=1&OOEU=1&NAT=3&RLB=1&NRLB=1&STD=1&NSTD=1&ST=1&MTO130=1&MTU130=1&UT=0&HDN=0&gID=0&sID=0&ssID=0&cID=1&rID=0&ctID=0&cmID=0&lID=0&pID=0&CLA=1&CLB=1&CLC=1&CLD=0&INFOR=1&NINFOR=1&INURB=1&NINURB=1&INPRK=1&NINPRK=1 zauważyłem, że z topoli, które rozgałęziają się ok. lub powyżej 10 metrów to 'moja' topola z Zalesia jest najwieksza. W dodatku mogła rosnąć przez cały czas w otoczeniu 'konkurencji' klonów i dębów, dzięki czemu ma taką rozłozysta koronę i wielki wzrost (wysokość). Pan Krzysztof Borkowksi powinien w kolejnym albumie polskich drzew ją umieścić, bo naprawde warto. Zawsze można poczuć sie jak odkrywca, bo najwyraźniej wszyscy o tym drzewie zapomnieli, skoro nawet nie jest pomnikiem przyrody.. Polecam zobaczyć w przyszłości i dziekuję Panu za te wszystkie informacje o drzewach, odkąd odkyłem te wszystkie strony w I klasie liceum, to od razu chciałem mierzyć i fotografować. Dopiero w tym roku na poważnie, bo po maturze sporo czasu, ale to chyba dobry start. Najlepszego i kolejnych pięknych okazów! :):)

po angielsku napisałem też dla ćwiczenia języka, a trochę dziwnie to wygląda, przepraszam

Piotr Gach, à 2014-09-04 08:04:15, a dit:
Thank you very much for your kind words about my RPDP website; see alsohttp://mojedrzewa.pl. As to your huge poplar from Zalesie - please attach it's photo (here or/and on RPDP website) if you have one. I am very interested how it looks like :).
Andrew Weber, à 2014-09-04 09:46:49, a dit:
Saturday, 6th September I will visit this poplar and then I will make a few more photos which could be on your site and you will see mentioned greatness of this tree. I can't wait for laser rangefinder, only if it hadn't been so expensive.. And I am really happy that I can see at least photos of Napoleon Oak or Lesznowska Topola (it's a pity that not Thick Fir from Babia Góra :). You don't know about trees which fell at the PRL time? I'm think that through 40years a few interesting Giants could end their lives, but only prof. Pacyniak was so keen on the trees to register them , it appears to me unbelieveable..

Best regards, AW

Piotr Gach, à 2014-09-10 13:12:57, a dit:
No, unfortunately I don't know anything about trees that fell in PRL time :(.



bodyman777, à 2014-09-10 02:01:56, a dit:
one of the most beautiful old trees in all of NJ check out some others at https://www.facebook.com/groups/MonarchTreesoftheDelawareValley/

RedRob, à 2014-09-08 16:17:34, a dit:
Superb tree, tallest in Europe (is it the tallest in the world measured?) Great to have laser measured trees, a 30 metre Juglans Regia was reported at Glen Lyon about a decade ago but turns out to be 20 metres laser measured, another in Suffolk was 27 metres but is 24.8 metres. This one is the tallest and accurate. Always have a soft spot for Juglans Regia since a holiday in Corfu in 1977 when I was nine and there was this beautiful tree right outside the balcony which I was fascinated with because of the aroma it gave off in the heat.

KoutaR, à 2014-09-09 07:18:51, a dit:
According Prof. Dr. Hans Pretzsch (in Enzyklopädie der Laubbäume), the species reaches 35 m in forest. Such heights sound extreme to us because walnut is not(?) planted in forest stands in our countries. This is the tallest laser-measured specimen so far I know, but I have no doubt that taller ones exist. Remember that the natural area extends over the Himalayas to Japan!

A 30-metre tree shrank to 20 m after a laser-measurement - quite extreme! I have encountered 40m -> 30m.

Sisley, à 2014-09-09 18:53:20, a dit:
Very nice trip in Georgia !!

A lot of tall species.

- - -

I know that a persian walnut was found in France, in a forest near Mulhouse (Alsace/1999) and the height was around 36 m.

The method is unknow. And I don't know if he's still alive.

- - -

Did you visit the Nordmann spruces's forests ?

KoutaR, à 2014-09-09 19:13:00, a dit:
I visited one place with Nordmann firs. On-coming soon...

RedRob, à 2014-09-09 16:51:46, a dit:
Conifers, would you be able to edit the location of this one as I cannot get the map to zoom in. It is just about in front of (below on map) Douglas Fir 3757 56 metres. Thanks.

Conifers, à 2014-09-09 18:32:32, a dit:
Done; let me know if it needs any further amendment.

RedRob, à 2014-09-09 16:42:21, a dit:
This tree doesn't look 40 metres? The angle of the photo must be very bad if it is?

Note on velvet maple heights
Visible pour tous · permalink · en
KoutaR, à 2014-09-07 20:39:14, édité à 2014-09-07 20:40:13, a dit:
Velvet maple (Acer velutinum) has been claimed to reach heights up to 50 m in northern Iran. The tallest maple I found in Lagodekhi Protected Areas, Georgia, was only 39.7 m (érable d'Asie (Acer velutinum) '19217').

However, the easiness of finding almost 40-metre maples and the fact that I found all the trees without any local help suggest that the species may reach well over 40 m even in this park. Moreover, the growing conditions are better in northern Iran, the winters being milder and the growing seasons longer. Compared with sycamore maple (A. pseudoplatanus), velvet maple generally seems to develop a beech-like straight trunk, which suggests a greater height potential than that of sycamore maple. Thus, my findings in eastern Georgia are no argument against the possibility that the species could reach 50 m. Ten years ago, I had the opportunity to visit some forests in northern Iran and I saw larger velvet maples there, though I cannot estimate their heights (some of my earlier estimates have proved to be totally wrong since I started to measure with a laser). I believe velvet maple is the tallest maple species of western Eurasia, but whether it really reaches 50 m remains a mystery. 50 m would be taller than the tallest bigleaf maple (A. macrophyllum) in California, which is 48.1 m ( http://www.mdvaden.com/maple_tallest.shtml).

RedRob, à 2014-09-08 16:05:27, a dit:
Hello Kouta, sounds like an exciting trip to Georgia, did you find any big Nordmann Firs on your travels? (haven't checked the main page yet so you may have posted something that I haven't seen)

KoutaR, à 2014-09-08 19:23:52, a dit:
Hello Rob!

No particularly big/tall firs. Up-coming in a few days...

MColombari1, à 2012-10-24 14:16:38, a dit:
Quercus suber
dickslingerland, à 2014-09-08 18:08:23, a dit:
wat een tand des tijds

RedRob, à 2014-09-08 16:13:43, a dit:
Great tree, almost looks as if it has lianas growing up the trunk.

KoutaR, à 2014-09-07 19:01:51, édité à 2014-09-07 19:03:02, a dit:
39.7-metre black poplar
KoutaR, à 2014-09-07 19:09:14, a dit:
I only wanted to add a caption but clicked a wrong button.

Jeroen Philippona, à 2014-09-07 17:20:46, a dit:
Hello Andrew,

You are doing a great job by posting so many beautiful big and old trees in Poland at this website! To my opinion the girth measurement of this oak was done the best in 2013 at 0,8 m: we recommend with trees with this form to measure it below 1,3 m at the smallest possible point, the 'taille', like advised at the measurement page: http://www.monumentaltrees.com/en/content/measuringgirth/ . So best would be to measure this also in 2014 and everytime you measure the tree, because this can be compared and gives an indication about the growth of the tree.

Best regards,


TheTreeRegisterOwenJohnson, à 2014-08-31 19:35:41, a dit:
Probably Catalpa x erubescens? The broad, mid-green leaves, irregular dome and abundant seed-pods are characteristic. Catalpa speciosa (in England) has yellow-green, rather triangular leaves with long points which are held very densely over the surface of the domed crown, which is open inside.
Wim Brinkerink, à 2014-09-02 14:54:31, a dit:
Hi Owen, Thank you for your support. I have visited the tree today again. I have uploaded the wrong picture tot this tree. I will change it and add another Catalpa. You suggest that it might be a catalpa x erubescens. According to my information Catalpa x erubescens is purple. This tree is surely very green. I will add an extra close up.
TheTreeRegisterOwenJohnson, à 2014-09-02 17:09:30, a dit:
One cultivar of Catalpa x erubescens, 'Purpurea', has leaves deep purple for a few days, then green, and its flowers have more purple spots, giving them a pale lilac cast. In England, the common clone is the original one, 'J C Teas', which has less of the purple pigment. This one looks the right colour to me for 'J C Teas'.
Wim Brinkerink, à 2014-09-06 15:56:16, édité à 2014-09-06 16:09:26, a dit:
Hi Owen,

I will change the species. Next spring I will try to get a confirmation of the purple outcoming. Thanks for your comment.

Hi Tim, Linked information to a picture
Visible pour tous · permalink · nl
Wim Brinkerink, à 2014-09-06 15:43:14, a dit:
Hi Tim,

On the 30th of august 2014, I posted an Alnus glutinosa aulne du Caucase (Alnus subcordata) '19088'. Owen Johnson argumented that this tree is most likely an Alnus subcordata. After waiting a few days an visiting the tree again, I support that view. First of all I changed the photo for a better one. But the moment I did it, the posted arguments of Owen vanished. Could you recollect these arguments again and place them next to the tree again.?


GJakobi, à 2014-09-06 08:56:50, a dit:
Habe die Seite entdeckt, als ich nach "Sequoia Thüringen" suchte ... Toll! Ich hatte schon immer ein Faible für große alte Bäume, das sich gerade jetzt mit etwas über 50 neu und auf besondere Weise weiter entwickelt.

Meine absoluten Lieblinge sind die Sequoias. Wann immer ich nach Hamburg komme, nutze ich die Gelegenheit in den Botanischen Garten Klein Flottbeck zu gehen, wo mehrere dieser erhabenen Bäume stehen - und es berührt mich jedesmal wieder zutiefst, zwischen ihnen zu verweilen ...

Schön, daß es diese Seite gibt, die es mir jetzt ermöglicht gezielt ein paar mehr unserer großen Freunde kennenzulernen ...

Frank Gyssling, à 2014-09-05 17:51:41, a dit:
sehr selten
Conifers, à 2014-09-05 18:11:09, a dit:
It's wrongly labelled, too - that's an Abies pinsapo ;-)

JackTessier, à 2014-09-05 14:07:15, a dit:
Photo taken September 5, 2014.

JackTessier, à 2014-09-05 14:00:53, a dit:
Photo taken September 5, 2014.

Bess, à 2014-09-04 22:37:19, a dit:
waaauw, Il a l'air super! Merci pour ajouter!

RedRob, à 2014-09-04 15:57:15, a dit:
Conifers, would you be able to edit the co-ordinates here, I cannot get the map tp shift at all. This tree is just a fraction down to the right of the Coast Redwood. Thanks. Made abit of a cock up with this tree last night but cannot now change, should be around 7 metres girth and exactly 49.2 metres height. Owen measured this tree on the east side of the Dell at 49 metres in 2005 so has hardly grown.

Conifers, à 2014-09-04 16:12:23, a dit:
Done! Can you check I've got the right tree please? I wasn't sure if it was the one I put the tag on, or the next one along immediately southeast.

RedRob, à 2014-09-04 16:34:04, a dit:
That's the chap, spot on Conifers, thanks.

Edit · MonumentalTrees.com
Visible pour tous · permalink · en
RedRob, à 2014-09-04 15:54:43, a dit:
Conifers, would you be able to edit the co-ordinates here, I cannot get the map tp shift at all. This tree is just a fraction down to the right of the Coast Redwood. Thanks. Made abit of a cock up with this tree last night but cannot now change, should be around 7 metres girth and exactly 49.2 metres height. Owen measured this tree on the east side of the Dell at 49 metres in 2005 so has hardly grown.

RedRob, à 2014-09-04 15:55:56, a dit:
Been on this site for some time and yet things still surprise, how this happened?

Zeltins, à 2014-09-04 07:07:22, a dit:
Last green branch broke off a storm in July 2014.

Site slowdown
Visible pour tous · permalink · nl
Tim, à 2014-08-10 10:46:37, édité à 2014-08-10 10:47:20, a dit:

as you probably all noticed the site got slower to even unreachable the last days.

I found the cause and have a solution in mind that I will try to implement today. This should cause the site (especially the image overview pages) to be faster than before, but in the meantime the overview pages per country/province/municipality will not list any images. The image pages as such (not the overview pages) will remain accessible and you can continue to use the site without restrictions.

Just so you know these empty image overview pages are intentional and temporary.

Kind regards,


Tim, à 2014-08-10 14:44:28, a dit:

everything should now be relatively fast again and working.

Kind regards,


Conifers, à 2014-08-14 19:33:13, a dit:
Thanks Tim!

One other cause of slowdown - the flickering numbers on the home page (number of registered trees, etc.) slow loading down quite a lot. I have also read that flickering images like this can be dangerous for people with epilepsy (they can trigger an epileptic fit). Maybe make the numbers appear in the final totals from the start, without the 'counting up'?

Tim, à 2014-08-15 16:34:41, a dit:
Hi Conifers,

I have to disappoint you but these moving counters don't slow down the site.

The actual numbers they stop on after moving are already known as soon as you see the page, and getting these numbers is much less than a fraction of a millisecond as it doesn't involve any actual counting. The moving numbers that you see then is just a simple animation that is done at the client's side to make that main page appear more dynamic (like see, the database is ever growing).

I made the color of the counters somewhat less black to soften the contrast.

Kind regards,


Andrew Weber, à 2014-09-04 00:22:45, édité à 2014-09-04 00:24:28, a dit:
Hi Tim,

sorry for taking your time, but I added more or less in 10th August a few great trees, generally oaks. Then, 2 weeks later, I went to this place to measure and make photos of the Giants. But it turned out that an image of the localization and respective specimens was very different (than I have read on the Net and in forestry, data was from about 1990) so I DELETED earlier-added trees and I once again added trees from this place, but with completely new localization (it is here - manor house and in vicinity of this place )

The problem is that I can see in statictics-site, for instance the largest in Łódź voivodeship) old records, data before deletion.

I have a lesson for future to firstly measure and then post the trees but can you repair it or nothing is to do with this thing

Best regards,


Andrew Weber, à 2014-09-02 00:10:48, a dit:
How it is possible to grow so well in such advanced age.. one of the greatest tree photos I have ever seen.. hopefully in future to see in real world not only on the Net
Frank Gyssling, à 2014-09-02 08:56:15, a dit:
Thanks for the compliment. This is really, in my opinion, one of the oldest and most vital stie oak in europe

many greetings frank

Andrew Weber, à 2014-09-03 23:30:31, a dit:
Yes, surely it is. Sorry for question, but Do you know, two other large oaks still exist and I could see a whole large 'family' in foreseeable future? I'd like to practise my German and to visit great places in Germany before studying at the University (from October). Do you think it would be generally possible to see these Giants for a few weeks? :)

Conifers, à 2014-09-02 19:39:08, a dit:
Chamaecyparis lawsiniana 'Wisselii'
Nardo Kaandorp, à 2014-09-03 17:55:11, a dit:
Hi Conifers,

Thanks! I allready thought so, now I'm sure.

Rgds, Nardo

pgs, à 2014-09-03 15:24:52, a dit:
Der Titel 'Japanischer Schnurbäume' sollte in korrektem Deutsch 'Japanischer Schnurbaum' heißen.

Die Titel enthalten die Namen sonst im Singular.

Schnurbäume ist Plural, dazu passt aber nicht die Adjektivendung -er sondern -e 'Japanische Schnurbäume'


Frank, à 2014-08-06 10:41:17, édité à 2014-08-06 12:33:54, a dit:
Hello Mairie,

this is a magnificent tree, but it is no Sequoiadendron giganteum. It's a Sequoia sempervirens. And if the girth measurement is indeed correct, it would even be the largest specimen here in Europe. It sure looks like a heavy trunk. Congratulations...:-0...!

Thanks for sharing...:-)

Best wishes


RedRob, à 2014-08-06 16:13:01, a dit:
Agree totally with Frank, what a magnificent Coast Redwood, second tallest recorded in Europe at the moment. The photo with the people walking past really gives a context, a perspective of it's size. Well done for bringing this tree to light. What is the climate like In Vals-les-Bains, not familiar with this area so will Google at some point if no rely.
KoutaR, à 2014-08-07 10:36:18, a dit:
Hello Mairie,

A magnificent tree, indeed. Which instrument did you use for the height measurement?


mairie07, à 2014-08-12 07:42:21, a dit:
bonjour et merci pour vos commentaires et compliments.

Pour la mesure nous avons utilisé la méthode théodolite à visée laser et pour la circonférence un ruban souple apposé au tronc.

Nous sommes situés dans le Sud Est de la France en région Rhône-Alpes dans le département de l’Ardèche.



Conifers, à 2014-08-14 19:29:44, a dit:
Still needs changing to Sequoia sempervirens - any objections to my doing so?
Jeroen Philippona, à 2014-08-14 20:28:59, édité à 2014-08-14 20:40:39, a dit:
Bonjour Mairie,

I hope you don't mind that I have changed the species from Sequoiadendron giganteum to Sequoia sempervirens, wich it very clearly is.

We like to have the right information on this website about species and measurements.

This specimen is extra interesting as indeed being probably the largest and second tallest Sequoia sempervirens tree in Europe we know of.

It seems to be a rival of the largest Seqoiadendron in Europe regarding to total woodvolume and could be one of the largest trees in Europe already.

Best regards,

Jeroen Philippona

Sisley, à 2014-08-15 16:58:40, a dit:
Very nice tree !!

The measures was made by personnel of the Town Hall and 'mairie 07' says that they used a theodolite, a surveying instrument.

mairie07, à 2014-09-03 09:04:44, a dit:
Merci à tous pour votre intérêt pour notre sequoia sempervirens. Je pense effectivement que ce sequoia est le second en Europe.

Les mesures ont été effectuées par une entreprise externe de géomètres experts.

Merci d'avoir rectifié sa catégorie. j'avais fait erreur lors de l'enregistrement sur le site.

Andrew Weber, à 2014-09-02 00:01:45, a dit:
The largest tree in Poland, really monumental trunk.. Proud of being a Pole :)
Jeroen Philippona, à 2014-09-02 22:05:57, a dit:
Yes, this is a tremendous oak, the most impressive I have seen in Poland. At the same day, November 15, 1999 Jeroen Pater and I visited also the big Dab Napoleon in Zabor. It is a pity that was put on fire by vandals.

Verplaatsen foto en commentaar
Visible pour tous · permalink · nl
Wim Brinkerink, à 2014-09-02 15:58:12, a dit:
Hallo Tim,

Ik heb een verkeerde foto geplaatst bij de boom catalpa à feuilles cordées (Catalpa speciosa) '9010'. Deze zou met het er op geleverde commentaar naar catalpa hybride (Catalpa × erubescens) '19141' moeten worde verplaatst. Kan dat? Of wil jij het svp doen?



Wim Brinkerink, à 2014-09-01 19:31:56, a dit:
I think this is the same tree as already was registered here. http://www.monumentaltrees.com/nl/usa/utah/washingtoncounty/3516_zionnationalpark/

TheTreeRegisterOwenJohnson, à 2014-08-31 19:31:36, a dit:
Possibly Alnus x spaethii (japonica x subcordata)? In England, Alnus japonica is an asymmetrical tree, seldom thriving, with notably slender leaves and a square-cracked bark. The hybrid is straight-trunked, very vigorous and leafy, with more ovate leaves, and has a vertically ridged bark, as in the photo.

Conifers, à 2014-08-31 13:57:48, a dit:
Too many leaflets for Juglans regia, and the terminal leaflet is not larger than the others. I suspect this is one of the hybrid walnuts, perhaps between Juglans regia and Juglans nigra, or between Juglans regia and Juglans ailantifolia.
TheTreeRegisterOwenJohnson, à 2014-08-31 19:23:26, a dit:
From the bark, I think it's J. x intermedia (nigra x regia). It's good to see such interesting rarities appearing on the site!

Wim Brinkerink, à 2014-08-30 11:18:49, a dit:

Jij hebt deze boom gedetermineerd als Betula platyphylla. Als ik de schors bekijk ziet hij er meer uit als een ermanii. Dat komt ook overeen met de beschrijving die aan het begin van het gebied Japan is gegeven. Maar..ik ga hem niet zonder meer wijzigen zonder jouw mening.

Conifers, à 2014-08-31 13:53:32, a dit:
I would agree with Betula platyphylla - the seed catkins (visible in the foliage photo) are slender and drooping, whereas on Betula ermannii they are stouter and erect.

TheTreeRegisterOwenJohnson, à 2014-08-31 19:20:02, a dit:
I think Betula ermanii x pubescens. A lot of big 'Betula ermanii' in Britain are this hybrid - presumably open-pollinated seedlings raised in Europe. In this case, the bark of the trunk is nearly B. pubescens, that of the smaller branches close to B. ermanii. The leaf is close to B. ermanii (but should show hairs on the stalk and under the veins). Fruit will show intermediate features. Betula [pendula subsp.] mandshurica/B. platyphylla in my experience has long-pointed triangular leaves which are a very dark (not yellowish-) green and forms a slender, sometimes slightly weeping tree.

Conifers, à 2014-08-31 13:55:25, a dit:
A pear Pyrus sp. Sorry, not sure which species.
TheTreeRegisterOwenJohnson, à 2014-08-31 19:14:21, a dit:
I think Malus yunnanensis. The bark is right (peeling in big scales of grey and brown). The fruit should have little raised white dots (not visible in the picture) and the leaf should be densely hairy underneath.

Leo Goudzwaard, à 2014-07-03 09:05:45, a dit:
prachtige vondst, een soort die erg zeldzaam is in NL en dan ook nog 3+. Er staat er een in het G.Hornemannplantsoen in Eindhoven van 2+

Wim Brinkerink, à 2014-08-31 09:54:10, a dit:
Ik zie nu pas dit commentaar. Ik was ook wel verrast om deze boom daar te treffen. De gemeente Voorschoten heeft zich hier aardig uitgesloofd om een verzameling bijzondere bomen te planten.

Japanse esdoorn
Visible pour tous · permalink · nl
Wim Brinkerink, à 2014-08-30 15:51:39, a dit:
Hallo Leo,

Ik heb geworsteld met de bomen in het Zuiderpark in Den Haag. Jij hebt o.m. er een aantal Japanse elzen geplaatst. Ik weet niet of ik in de aanpassingen er helemaal ben uitgekomen, maar we kunnen van alles verbeteren. Ik zag in jouw boek dat je melding maakte van de originele Japanse els die in het Arboretum zou staan. Misschien, zo meldde je was de boom die jij benoemde wel een hybride.

Intrigerend en leuk. Ik heb je in eerste instantie gevolgd en geprobeerd aan te vullen en van foto's te voorzien. Toen ik klaars was en mijn foto's bekeek, zag ik dat ter plekke een els me in het Japan-deel had geïntrigeerd. Misschien, zo denk ik, is dat wel de echte Japanse els. Ik zal hem posten als niet gedetermineerde boom.

Ter verduidelijking. Ziet er oud uit. Is kronkelig , is onmiskenbaar een els en staat in het Japanse deel.

Wie weet.?



Sisley, à 2014-08-29 18:17:37, a dit:

Nice girth for a pear tree ! Any picture of this specimen ?

Wim Brinkerink, à 2014-08-26 15:37:37, a dit:
Mooi foto

Trompetboom in de Stropstraat
Visible pour tous · permalink · nl
Tim, à 2014-08-26 08:11:29, a dit:
Hallo Bess,

ken jij deze boom? http://www.nieuwsblad.be/article/detail.aspx?articleid=B4303FHO

Ik heb hem toegevoegd als:

Broeders van Liefde Stropstraat

Hoewel ik daar jarenlang vlakbij op kot zat, heb ik deze nog nooit gezien.




Page d'accueil · Retour haut de page · Partager/Enregistrer

© MonumentalTrees.com · avertissement · aussi disponible en · Castellano · Deutsch · English · Nederlands · traduire?